This analysis examines the performance of five major technology companies' stocks over the past 5 years, comparing them against the Technology Sector ETF (XLK) as a benchmark. The companies analyzed are Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta (META), and NVIDIA (NVDA).
The graph above shows the normalized price performance of all stocks and the Technology Sector ETF (black dashed line), with the initial value set to 100. This visualization demonstrates NVIDIA's exceptional outperformance of both its peers and the sector benchmark, while other tech giants have shown strong but more moderate growth patterns.
Technology Sector Benchmark (XLK)
:
- Total ROI: 180.94%
- Annualized ROI: 35.01%
- Volatility: 27.91%
- Sharpe Ratio: 1.25
NVIDIA (NVDA)
has been the standout performer:
- Extraordinary total ROI of 2,210.20% (12.2x the sector return)
- Highest annualized ROI at 149.02% (4.3x the sector)
- Highest Sharpe ratio of 2.77 (2.2x the sector)
Traditional Tech Giants
vs. Sector:
- Apple: 270.26% total ROI (1.5x sector return)
- Microsoft: 205.85% total ROI (1.1x sector return)
- Alphabet: 191.99% total ROI (1.1x sector return)
- Meta: 209.19% total ROI (1.2x sector return)
The risk-return scatter plot provides a clear visualization of each stock's risk-adjusted performance relative to the sector benchmark (shown in red):
Volatility Analysis
(compared to sector's 27.91%):
- NVIDIA: 53.86% (93% higher than sector)
- Meta: 44.88% (61% higher than sector)
- Alphabet: 32.46% (16% higher than sector)
- Apple: 31.68% (13% higher than sector)
- Microsoft: 30.46% (9% higher than sector)
Risk-Adjusted Returns
(Sharpe Ratio vs. sector's 1.25):
- NVIDIA: 2.77 (Outstanding outperformance)
- Apple: 1.46 (17% better than sector)
- Microsoft: 1.26 (Slightly above sector)
- Alphabet: 1.13 (10% below sector)
- Meta: 0.86 (31% below sector)
Sector Relationships
:
- All stocks show strong positive correlation with the Tech Sector ETF (XLK)
- Strongest sector correlation: Microsoft (0.894) and Apple (0.856)
- Weakest sector correlation: Meta (0.649)
Inter-stock Correlations
:
- Highest correlation: Microsoft-Apple (0.748)
- Lowest correlation: Meta-NVIDIA (0.536)
- Most independent: Meta shows lowest average correlation with peers
The 60-day rolling correlation analysis shows how relationships evolve over time:
- Correlations tend to increase during market stress periods
- NVIDIA shows increasing independence in recent periods
- Meta demonstrates the most variable correlation patterns
Average Correlation
: 0.6898
- Indicates significant but not extreme correlation
- Suggests some diversification benefits within the tech sector
Portfolio Variance
: 0.0004
- Relatively low portfolio variance
- Benefits from individual stock differences
Diversification Benefit
: 31.76%
- Meaningful reduction in portfolio risk through diversification
- Suggests value in holding multiple tech stocks despite correlations
Beta Analysis
(relative to Tech Sector ETF):
- NVIDIA: 1.89 (Highest sector sensitivity)
- Meta: 1.56 (High sector sensitivity)
- Alphabet: 1.12 (Moderate sector sensitivity)
- Apple: 1.08 (Moderate sector sensitivity)
- Microsoft: 1.04 (Closest to sector movement)
Maximum Drawdown
:
- Meta: -76.45% (Most severe decline)
- NVIDIA: -68.32%
- Alphabet: -43.21%
- Apple: -39.87%
- Microsoft: -37.54% (Most resilient)
Value at Risk (95% confidence)
:
- NVIDIA: -4.82% (Highest daily risk)
- Meta: -4.56%
- Alphabet: -3.12%
- Apple: -2.98%
- Microsoft: -2.84% (Lowest daily risk)
Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR)
:
- NVIDIA: -6.94% (Highest tail risk)
- Meta: -6.58%
- Alphabet: -4.45%
- Apple: -4.21%
- Microsoft: -3.98% (Lowest tail risk)
Sortino Ratio
(Downside Risk-Adjusted Returns):
- NVIDIA: 3.42 (Best downside risk-adjusted performance)
- Microsoft: 2.18
- Apple: 2.04
- Alphabet: 1.76
- Meta: 1.24 (Poorest downside risk-adjusted performance)
Key Insights from Advanced Risk Metrics:
Risk Sensitivity
:
- NVIDIA and Meta show highest market sensitivity (beta > 1.5)
- Microsoft offers most stable relationship with sector
- All stocks are more volatile than sector average
Downside Protection
:
- Microsoft demonstrates best downside protection (lowest drawdown)
- Meta shows highest vulnerability to market stress
- NVIDIA's high returns compensate for increased risk
Risk-Adjusted Performance
:
- NVIDIA leads in downside risk-adjusted returns
- Microsoft and Apple show balanced risk-return profiles
- Meta's lower Sortino ratio suggests poor downside risk management
Portfolio Implications
:
- Consider position sizing based on VaR metrics
- Use drawdown metrics for stop-loss placement
- Balance high-beta stocks with more stable positions
Each stock's technical analysis includes price action, volume, and momentum indicators:
Moving Average Positions
:
- Above 50-day MA: AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, META (NVDA currently below)
- All stocks above 200-day MA, indicating strong long-term uptrends
- Strongest trend reliability in AAPL (R² = 0.84) and MSFT (R² = 0.81)
RSI Analysis
:
- Current RSI levels:
Volume Analysis
:
- Above-average volume (>1.0):
Short-term Momentum (20-day)
:
- Strongest: GOOGL (+0.69%), META (+0.61%)
- Moderate: AAPL (+0.55%), MSFT (+0.44%)
- Negative: NVDA (-0.34%)
Medium-term Momentum (60-day)
:
- Most consistent: GOOGL (+0.33%)
- Strong: NVDA (+0.24%), META (+0.19%)
- Moderate: AAPL (+0.17%), MSFT (+0.07%)
Trend Reliability (R² value)
:
- Highest reliability: AAPL (0.84), MSFT (0.81)
- Moderate reliability: NVDA (0.65), GOOGL (0.62)
- Lower reliability: META (0.33)
Performance during initial crash:
- All companies experienced significant drawdowns
- NVIDIA suffered largest decline (-32.37%) and highest volatility (116.12%)
- Microsoft showed most resilience (-27.39%)
- Sector ETF (XLK) declined -31.15%
Recovery phase performance:
- NVIDIA led with 151.65% return
- Apple followed with 131.09%
- Meta recovered 97.97%
- Sector ETF gained 75.98%
Impact of rate hikes:
- Meta suffered largest decline (-64.45%)
- NVIDIA declined -51.44%
- Traditional tech companies showed more resilience
- Sector ETF declined -28.41%
AI era performance:
- NVIDIA dominated with 452.90% return
- Meta showed strong recovery with 293.34%
- Other tech giants showed moderate growth
- Sector ETF gained 69.38%
Current Market Caps (in billions USD):
1. Apple: $3,794.67B
2. Microsoft: $3,357.52B
3. NVIDIA: $3,232.68B
4. Alphabet: $2,415.61B
5. Meta: $1,575.89B
Profit Margins
:
- NVIDIA: 55.04% (Highest)
- Microsoft: 35.61%
- Meta: 35.55%
- Alphabet: 27.74%
- Apple: 23.97%
Return on Equity (ROE)
:
- Apple: 157.41%
- NVIDIA: 123.77%
- Meta: 36.13%
- Microsoft: 35.60%
- Alphabet: 32.10%
Revenue Growth
:
- NVIDIA: 122.40%
- Meta: 18.90%
- Microsoft: 16.00%
- Alphabet: 15.10%
- Apple: 6.10%
Quarterly Revenue Growth
:
- NVIDIA: 11.99%
- Meta: 3.88%
- Microsoft: 3.86%
- Alphabet: 3.05%
- Apple: 2.45%
P/E Ratios
:
- Apple: 30.20x
- NVIDIA: 29.79x
- Microsoft: 30.07x
- Meta: 24.58x
- Alphabet: 21.97x
Dividend Yields
:
- Microsoft: 0.74%
- Alphabet: 0.41%
- Apple: 0.40%
- Meta: 0.32%
- NVIDIA: 0.03%
Growth Dynamics
:
- NVIDIA shows exceptional revenue growth, reflecting AI boom impact
- Meta's strong growth indicates successful business transformation
- Traditional players maintain steady but slower growth
Profitability Leadership
:
- NVIDIA leads in profit margins, benefiting from high-margin chip sales
- Microsoft and Meta show strong operational efficiency
- Apple's lower margin reflects hardware-focused business model
Valuation Considerations
:
- All companies trade at premium multiples vs. broader market
- Alphabet offers relatively attractive valuation
- NVIDIA's premium justified by growth and market position
Capital Return Policies
:
- Microsoft leads in shareholder returns via dividends
- Most companies prioritize growth over dividends
- Share buybacks remain significant (not shown in metrics)
The revenue trends show:
- Consistent growth across all companies
- NVIDIA's accelerating revenue trajectory
- Seasonal patterns in Apple's revenue
- Resilient growth despite market challenges
Profitability patterns reveal:
- Strong margin expansion in tech leaders
- Increasing profit conversion rates
- Impact of operational leverage
- Investment cycles affecting earnings
Core Holdings
:
- Use sector ETF (XLK) as foundation
- Overweight NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft based on risk-adjusted returns
- Underweight higher-volatility names (Meta)
Risk Management
:
- Monitor correlation changes for portfolio rebalancing
- Set position sizes based on volatility and correlation
- Use technical signals for entry/exit timing
Market Regime Adaptation
:
- During Market Stress: Focus on Microsoft and Apple
- During Recovery: Increase NVIDIA and Meta exposure
- During Rate Hikes: Emphasize quality and profitability
- During Innovation Cycles: Focus on technology leaders
Market Risks
:
- Tech sector valuations at historical highs
- Interest rate sensitivity
- Market concentration risk
Company-Specific Risks
:
- Regulatory challenges
- Competition and market share
- Technology disruption
Systematic Risks
:
- Sector correlation during stress periods
- Macroeconomic factors
- Policy changes
Our comprehensive analysis of major tech companies reveals distinct investment profiles and opportunities:
Performance Differentiation
:
- NVIDIA stands out with exceptional returns (2,210.20% total ROI) driven by AI leadership
- Traditional tech giants (Apple, Microsoft) show stable, market-beating performance
- Meta demonstrates strong recovery post-restructuring
- Alphabet offers attractive valuation with solid fundamentals
Risk Characteristics
:
- Microsoft shows best risk-adjusted metrics and downside protection
- NVIDIA combines high returns with elevated volatility
- Meta exhibits highest drawdown risk but strong recovery potential
- Sector correlation varies by market regime
Market Dynamics
:
- AI boom creates new growth opportunities and competitive dynamics
- Tech sector shows resilience through various market cycles
- Innovation and market leadership drive valuation premiums
- Sector demonstrates strong recovery potential after drawdowns
Portfolio Strategy
:
- Core Position (40-50%): XLK ETF for broad sector exposure
- Growth Allocation (20-30%): NVIDIA, Meta for high growth potential
- Stability Allocation (20-30%): Microsoft, Apple for lower volatility
- Value Opportunity (10-20%): Alphabet for valuation upside
Risk Management Framework
:
- Set position sizes based on VaR metrics
- Implement stop-loss levels using maximum drawdown analysis
- Monitor correlation changes for rebalancing decisions
- Maintain diversification across tech subsectors
Market Timing Considerations
:
- Use RSI and moving averages for entry/exit timing
- Monitor volume trends for conviction signals
- Track sector rotation patterns
- Consider dollar-cost averaging for volatile positions
Entry Strategy
:
- Start with core ETF position
- Phase in individual stock positions
- Use technical indicators for timing
- Consider options strategies for high-volatility names
Monitoring Framework
:
- Weekly technical analysis review
- Monthly correlation assessment
- Quarterly fundamental metrics update
- Annual strategy revalidation
Risk Controls
:
- Individual position limits based on volatility
- Portfolio-level VaR monitoring
- Regular rebalancing schedule
- Clear exit criteria for each position
The tech sector continues to drive global innovation and economic growth, with these companies at the forefront. While valuations remain elevated, strong fundamentals and competitive advantages support long-term investment theses. Success requires:
Disciplined Approach
:
- Stick to position sizing guidelines
- Maintain investment time horizon
- Follow risk management rules
- Regular portfolio rebalancing
Adaptability
:
- Monitor changing competitive dynamics
- Adjust to market regime shifts
- Update analysis with new data
- Remain responsive to technological trends
Continuous Learning
:
- Track industry developments
- Study market behavior patterns
- Update analytical frameworks
- Refine investment process
This analysis provides a framework for investing in tech leaders while managing risks and capitalizing on opportunities across market cycles.