For most of our careers, we in the tech world have been trained to be elite paddlers. We competed on a few key metrics:
- Core Strength: How strong is your grasp of data structures and algorithms?
- Paddling Form: How well do you adhere to coding standards and design patterns?
- Endurance: How many late nights can you pull to outwork everyone else?
We found our sense of worth in paddling faster and farther than the next person.
Then came the steam engine: AI. It never tires, never needs a break, and from the moment it starts, it generates more power than we could ever muster after a decade of study and another decade of toil. The paddling skills we were once so proud of are rapidly losing their value.
This has led to a widespread anxiety: "AI is competing for my job. How can I possibly win in a race this lopsided?"
Before we tackle that question, let's go back to basics. Even in the age of human-powered vessels, did the success of a ship truly depend only on its paddlers?
The reality is, an ace paddler might be twice as fast as an average one. But over the entire course of a long voyage, that twofold advantage is often negligible. Higher-level decisions can easily render it irrelevant.
- A mistake in judgment: If the navigator chooses the wrong destination from the start, it doesn't matter how fast you paddle—you're just wasting energy in the wrong direction.
- Poor technical orchestration: If the route is poorly planned, constantly fighting headwinds and storms, even the strongest paddlers will be exhausted.
- A failure to deliver value: If you return from a grueling journey with cargo that no one wants to buy, the commercial value of your entire voyage is zero.
Once we internalize this, we can break free from our obsession with paddling speed. The real concern was never that AI paddles faster than us, but that paddling is all we know how to do.
The arrival of the steam engine didn't spell the end for sailors; it triggered an evolution of their roles. The most valuable people were no longer the sweat-drenched paddlers below deck, but the two figures on deck who controlled the destiny of this new power system. These two roles also need to evolve with the times.
The first new role is the AI Navigator. Their core responsibility is to decide where the ship is going. They need to understand the dynamics of the business world to define the ultimate goal and meaning of the voyage.
In this new era, the Navigator no longer relies solely on personal experience and intuition. Their bridge is now equipped with an AI-powered analytics system that can process vast amounts of market data, technological trends, and policy changes, offering unprecedented decision support. They use their human wisdom, experience, and business acumen to command the flood of data from AI, ultimately making higher-quality judgments.
The second new role is the AI Chief Engineer. Their core responsibility is to ensure the ship reaches its destination efficiently and reliably. They work deep in the engine room, the only one who can truly communicate with the great iron beast. They are responsible for translating the Navigator's strategic intent into precise instructions that the engine can understand.
This is not a traditional mechanic. The Chief Engineer must become an expert on the AI engine, deeply understanding its internal workings. They know that giving a vague command like "full speed ahead" is inefficient and even harmful, as it can cause the engine to overheat and produce erroneous results (hallucinations). They must control the engine with the finesse of a systems engineer. For example, they will first pre-warm the engine (by providing the AI with sufficient background knowledge and context). Then, they will stabilize the steam pressure at 70% (by setting constraints and adjusting the inference temperature to regulate the AI's output). Finally, they will accelerate to full power along a smooth curve over three minutes (by using multi-turn dialogue and iteration to gradually guide the AI to produce the final, high-quality result). This is how they tame the beast, ensuring the AI engine delivers power in a stable, efficient, and reliable way.
A successful voyage is the result of collaboration between these two roles. The Navigator's vision points the ship in the right direction; the Chief Engineer's skill turns that vision into a solid, reliable course. Their partnership defines the ceiling of what a company or a team can achieve in the age of AI.
Now, let's return to that initial, anxiety-inducing question: "How do I compete with AI?"
By now, the answer should be clear. The question itself is wrong.
The most profound change AI brings is not a zero-sum competition, but an invitation for a professional upgrade. It is forcing the obsolescence of the paddling role, compelling all of us to get out of our low, crowded, and view-obstructed paddler's seat.
So, our real challenge isn't to figure out how to paddle faster than a machine. It's to make a choice: do we stay in the paddler's seat, or do we stand up, walk onto the deck, and become a Navigator or a Chief Engineer?
The wave of AI is not eliminating people, but roles. It is eliminating the paddler, but at the same time, it's creating massive demand for Navigators and Chief Engineers.
Your value is no longer determined by your paddling speed, but by the new role you choose. Are you ready to leave your seat?
Comments